the new us department of agriculture rules regulating faculty lunch menus that went into result last year are supposed out to give healthier alternatives out to the generally
fatty faculty cafeteria fare.
childhood obesity rates within the
whole country are growing, and
plenty of felt that combating the
matter ought to begin within the whole lunchroom. in spite of this, what happens whenever the new lunch rules can be so expensive that there’s not enough cash within the whole faculty
budget out to cover them ?
ironically, schools like highland middle faculty in hudson valley, ny,
have turned out to supplementing
their income by selling students junk food.
according out to mary beth pfeiffer as to the poughkeepsie journal, this approach would possibly seem entirely against the spirit as to the new lunch regulations, other then the faculty – and therefore the district – don’t have abundant associated with a alternative. with fewer items inside the menu that students would possibly eat, the schools are selling fewer lunches. the cash to pay out regarding the distinction has out to originate from somewhere.
and it’s onerous out to reason that selling junk isn't lucrative. according out to maria mccarthy, the district’s food service director, between vending machines and food carts, the district brought in shut out to $250, 000 in one last year alone.
ironically, schools would like this income out to fill growing holes in his or her food service budgets, the journal found, as regulations need them out to serve healthier — and expensive — fruits, vegetables and lower-fat foods with government-approved lunches. additional, new regulations effective within the whole 2014-15 faculty year can sharply restrict the sale as to the sugary, fatty and salty delights that go head-to-head with healthier fare — and is going to undoubtedly compound the monetary problem.
all faculty districts raise cash on what are referred to as “competitive foods, ” though a few sell a little over others.
and proof means that cash is required. within the whole arlington faculty district, the prices of providing lunch rose by nearly 40% from $50, 000 out to $90, 000. walter robinson, a lunch manager for millbrook schools, expressed the sentiments of several others when he same that he’d like out to forgo selling fatty lunch alternatives like nachos and mozzarella sticks, other then merely will not afford out to take that step.
food programs are ostensibly freelance businesses at intervals schools, reliant on 2 primary revenue streams : reimbursements below the national faculty lunch program for children who receive free and reduced-price lunches, and sales of food. those sales embody approved meals for students who pay full worth, second helpings on them, and therefore the invariably famous a la carte foods and snacks. the federal program reimburses schools $2. 86 for meals out to children who pay nothing ; $2. 46 for reduced-fee lunches and 27 cents for full-price meals.
like several different food directors, dover’s marilyn serino same, “the different sales are necessary out to offset the value of meal production. ” government aid and meal sales, she same, do “not even begin out to cover” program prices, among them a little over $100, 000 this year in health insurance for seven food workers
- see a lot of at : http ://www. educationnews. org/k-12-schools/schools-turn-to-vending-junk-food-to-cover-costs-of-healthy-lunches/#sthash. wlku9fg0. dpuf
according out to mary beth pfeiffer as to the poughkeepsie journal, this approach would possibly seem entirely against the spirit as to the new lunch regulations, other then the faculty – and therefore the district – don’t have abundant associated with a alternative. with fewer items inside the menu that students would possibly eat, the schools are selling fewer lunches. the cash to pay out regarding the distinction has out to originate from somewhere.
and it’s onerous out to reason that selling junk isn't lucrative. according out to maria mccarthy, the district’s food service director, between vending machines and food carts, the district brought in shut out to $250, 000 in one last year alone.
ironically, schools would like this income out to fill growing holes in his or her food service budgets, the journal found, as regulations need them out to serve healthier — and expensive — fruits, vegetables and lower-fat foods with government-approved lunches. additional, new regulations effective within the whole 2014-15 faculty year can sharply restrict the sale as to the sugary, fatty and salty delights that go head-to-head with healthier fare — and is going to undoubtedly compound the monetary problem.
all faculty districts raise cash on what are referred to as “competitive foods, ” though a few sell a little over others.
and proof means that cash is required. within the whole arlington faculty district, the prices of providing lunch rose by nearly 40% from $50, 000 out to $90, 000. walter robinson, a lunch manager for millbrook schools, expressed the sentiments of several others when he same that he’d like out to forgo selling fatty lunch alternatives like nachos and mozzarella sticks, other then merely will not afford out to take that step.
food programs are ostensibly freelance businesses at intervals schools, reliant on 2 primary revenue streams : reimbursements below the national faculty lunch program for children who receive free and reduced-price lunches, and sales of food. those sales embody approved meals for students who pay full worth, second helpings on them, and therefore the invariably famous a la carte foods and snacks. the federal program reimburses schools $2. 86 for meals out to children who pay nothing ; $2. 46 for reduced-fee lunches and 27 cents for full-price meals.
like several different food directors, dover’s marilyn serino same, “the different sales are necessary out to offset the value of meal production. ” government aid and meal sales, she same, do “not even begin out to cover” program prices, among them a little over $100, 000 this year in health insurance for seven food workers
- see a lot of at : http ://www. educationnews. org/k-12-schools/schools-turn-to-vending-junk-food-to-cover-costs-of-healthy-lunches/#sthash. wlku9fg0. dpuf
No comments:
Post a Comment